One of modern man’s most urgent and insurmountable fears is the fear of cancer.
Even a form of phobia is represented by it.
Oncology is a malignancy in the body that affects and conditions its activity. In addition, oncology indicates the strength of immunity. After all, the immune system plays an essential role in the outcome of the fight between the organism and oncology.
Studying the origin of immunity, its nature and its functionality, I concluded that immunity activity provides a fundamental function of life – self-regulation.
The ability and outcome of the organism to overcome malignancy (cancer) depend on the activity and functionality of immunity as self-regulation. Therefore, a malignancy not only affects the self-regulation of the organism but also practically restructures it, thus determining its ability to survive.
Speaking of malignancy, which is fully described in medicine, biology, anatomy, and physiology, we can point out that it is a state of the immune system in which two mutually exclusive processes act together: the process of reproduction of life and the process of total decay, i.e. self-destruction.
The total decay of immunity characterizes the action of malignancy in the organism.
Consequently, malignancy is a condition of an organ that is affected by an awful alteration process of its functionality and, usually, is directed towards its forced disappearance. In most cases, malignancy is latent and the appearance of which is always associated with destructive changes.
Be that as it may, when we speak of malignancy, we always encounter death, which is a strong argument in favour of stating the existence of a mental state of “total fear of death from oncology”, i.e. oncophobia.
But I want to point out the “oncology” in the PSYCHIC dimension, which disrupts people’s interaction system with reality while acting as a parameter of social success and a guarantee of social dominance. More precisely, I will talk about SOCIAL malignancy.
In general, social malignancy in people’s contemporary relations with reality has an outward appearance of tolerance, that is, social tolerance, which, on closer examination, covers even the best of intentions with mud and blackness.
But what is real in social malignancy is total destruction. The socially malignant man seeks the destruction of that “other” without whom his life is impossible, without realizing it himself. But the most vital thing for him is “dying” of this “other”, not living together with him. This person is incapable of building a relationship through love. On the contrary, he is “falling in love to death”.
It will not be mistaken to suppose that reality for each person is represented by “the other”, i.e. the recognition that there is that other person with whom one must interact and somehow “cohabit” in the territory of a shared social space. As it happens, but without this “other” we cannot define who we are. Consequently, social malignancy has NOTHING that represents and demonstrates it.
Conventionally, a person who can be defined as malignant is often in the group of “successful” and “socially recognized” in the modern world. He is particularly successful in winning competitive battles and obtaining material benefits. You will meet him at charity events and round tables in support of the most pressing issues and social actions for the most suffering. He uncompromisingly destroys his opponents in ways long-known but not so popular. He is always there when you need help and guarantees it for you. Yes, that’s exactly how a socially maligned man meets “deeply moral standards.”
Isn’t that the case with a malignancy in the body? After all, when it is diagnosed in an organ, there is a picture of a mass of immense beauty.
So, the genuine traits of social malignancy are:
Social malignancy, then, is that human condition in which the destruction of another is the only possible and acceptable form of self-preservation and life.
Yes, a person with social malignancy never has phobias and panic attacks, for they live in a state of psychosis and pleasure of the other almost their entire life.
Faced with this malignancy form, you sometimes have such a traumatic experience that it serves not so much as a means to self-development but as a real incentive to seek help from a psychotherapist or even a neurologist or psychiatrist. It is the level of the relationship with reality, at which there are only two ways out: either to resist or to withdraw, often even to die symbolically in terms of social being.
It is what self-regulation is all about, the ability to survive.
<< Back to the list of articles
